-->

International Scientist Appeal On Electromagnetic Fields & Wireless Technology

reviewed enquiry on electromagnetic fields   International Scientist Appeal on Electromagnetic Fields & Wireless Technology
International EMF Scientist Appeal
Jan 1, 2019

Two hundred forty-seven (247) scientists from 42 nations have signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal. All have published peer-reviewed enquiry on electromagnetic fields (EMF) as well as biological scientific discipline or wellness -- totaling more than 2,000 papers on EMF in professional person journals. In addition, 10 scientists who cause got published peer-reviewed enquiry on related topics cause got signed this petition.

The Appeal calls on the World Health Organization (WHO) as well as the United Nations (UN) including all of its fellow member states and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) to adopt to a greater extent than protective exposure guidelines for EMF as well as wireless engineering scientific discipline inwards the seem upwardly of increasing bear witness of wellness risks.These exposures are a chop-chop growing shape of worldwide environmental pollution.

Baca Juga


Links to to a greater extent than than 50 tidings stories published inwards over ii dozen nations tin hold upwardly found on the Appeal web site under media coverage.


Jul 10, 2018

Two hundred forty-two (242) scientists from 41 nations including 38 from the U.S. cause got signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal. All have published peer-reviewed enquiry on electromagnetic fields (EMF) as well as biological scientific discipline or health. In addition, 10 scientists who cause got published peer-reviewed enquiry on related topics cause got signed this petition.


Sep 20, 2017

Two hundred thirty-five (235) scientists from 41 nations including 33 from the U.S. cause got signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal. All have published peer-reviewed enquiry on electromagnetic fields (EMF) as well as biological scientific discipline or health. 



Mar 10, 2016

Over one hundred EMF advocacy as well as didactics nongovernmental organizations from 23 nations cause got signed a alphabetic lineament inwards back upwardly of the International EMF Scientist Appeal.  The alphabetic lineament was prepared past times the IEMFA, the International Electromagnetic Fields Alliance

The letter calls upon all governments throughout the basis to ... recognize that exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) is an emerging wellness as well as environmental crisis that requires a high priority response; review currently available EMF exposure data that demonstrates price to humans as well as nature; revise electrical flow EMF exposure guidelines as well as suggest how they tin hold upwardly lowered; as well as adopt precautionary measures to cut back EMF exposure.


Feb 8, 2016

Two hundred as well as 20 scientists from 41 nations cause got signed the International EMF Scientist AppealAll cause got published peer-reviewed enquiry on electromagnetic fields (EMF) as well as biological scientific discipline or health. In addition, nine scientists who cause got published peer-reviewed enquiry on related topics cause got signed this petition.

The nations alongside the most signatories are the U.S. of A. (with 29), Italy (19), Republic of Korea (15), Turkey (15), Republic of Republic of India (12), PRC (11), UK of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland (11), Canada (9), Brazil (8), Iran (8), Commonwealth of Australia (7), Espana (7), Deutschland (6), Sweden (6), Republic of Finland (5), Hellenic Republic (5), as well as Russian Federation (5).


Dec 22, 2015

The European Journal of Oncology published the text of the International EMF Scientist Appeal inwards its Dec edition. The periodical publishes contributions inwards the diverse areas of oncology including biology, epidemiology, pathology as well as clinical medicine.
International Appeal: Scientists telephone telephone for protection from non-ionizing electromagnetic plain exposure. European Journal of Oncology. 20(3/4): 180-182. 2015.
Abstract
We are scientists engaged inwards the report of biological as well as wellness effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF). Based upon peer-reviewed, published research, nosotros cause got serious concerns regarding the ubiquitous as well as increasing exposure to EMF generated past times electrical as well as wireless devices. These include–but are non express to–radiofrequency radiations (RFR) emitting devices, such every bit cellular as well as cordless phones as well as their base of operations stations, Wi-Fi, broadcast antennas, smart meters, as well as babe monitors too every bit electrical devices as well as infra-structures used inwards the delivery of electricity that generate extremely-low frequency electromagnetic plain (ELF EMF).
http://www.mattioli1885journals.com/index.php/Europeanjournalofoncology/article/view/4971

Oct 15, 2015

Two hundred 15 scientists from 40 nations cause got signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal


Jun 25, 2015

WHO: It's fourth dimension for a change

The World Health Organization promotes the radio frequency radiations guidelines adopted past times the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). Many countries cause got adopted these guidelines to serve every bit their regulatory standards for wireless radiations exposure from jail cellular telephone phones, Wi-Fi, as well as other wireless devices.

ICNIRP has fourteen members on the commission. ICNIRP late announced that is calling for nominations to serve on the Commission from 2016 to 2020. To hold upwardly eligible for membership, 1 must hold upwardly nominated past times the Executive Council of the International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA) or an IRPA Associate Society.

IRPA, the international professional person guild for radiological protection, was created past times wellness physicists alongside expertise inwards ionizing radiation. The Executive Council consists of 12 members including 7 physicists, ii engineers, a nuclear technologist, a biochemist, as well as an M.D. biologist. Their expertise as well as the primary focus of their association has been on protection from ionizing radiation. So it is reasonable to inquiry why the eligibility criteria for ICNIRP membership requires that ICNIRP members hold upwardly nominated past times IRPA or its affiliates since ICNIRP’s domain is non-ionizing radiations protection.

Do the alternative criteria for ICNIRP membership explicate why ICNIRP has non adopted biologically-based guidelines to protect people from non-ionizing radiation?

ICNIRP should hold upwardly composed of members who possess a comprehensive as well as deep agreement of the scientific literature regarding chronic, depression intensity exposure to non-ionizing radiations as well as biological scientific discipline or health. In addition, these experts should be unbiased as well as should non cause got fifty-fifty the appearance of a conflict of interest.

Recently, 206 scientists signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal, a petition which claims that "the ICNIRP guidelines create non comprehend long-term exposure as well as low-intensity effects" as well as "they are insufficient to protect world health."  All of these scientists cause got published peer-reviewed enquiry on non-ionizing radiations protection.
"The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) established inwards 1998 the “Guidelines For Limiting Exposure To Time-Varying Electric, Magnetic, as well as Electromagnetic Fields (up to 300 GHz)”[1]." These guidelines are accepted past times the WHO as well as numerous countries unopen to the world. The WHO is calling for all nations to adopt the ICNIRP guidelines to encourage international harmonization of standards. In 2009, the ICNIRP released a contention maxim that it was reaffirming its 1998 guidelines, every bit inwards their opinion, the scientific literature published since that fourth dimension “has provided no bear witness of whatsoever adverse effects below the basic restrictions as well as does non require an immediate revision of its guidance on limiting exposure to high frequency electromagnetic fields."http://emfscientist.org/index.php/emf-scientist-appeal
Perhaps, it is fourth dimension for the WHO to supercede ICNIRP alongside an skilful commission that has greater expertise regarding non-ionizing radiations protection as well as purpose this commission to constitute the WHO guidelines for wireless radiation. 


Jun 8, 2015

Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D. submitted the International EMF Scientist Appeal along alongside the Press Release as well as a description of the Appeal to the Federal Communications Commission inwards answer to an FCC request for input regarding its radio frequency radiations regulations which were adopted inwards 1996 (Proceeding Number 13-84).

These 3 documents tin hold upwardly downloaded from FCC spider web site at http://bit.ly/FCCappeal.

A summary of substitution documents submitted to the FCC nether Proceeding Number 13-84 is available at http://bit.ly/FCCkeydocs.


Jun 4, 2015

The "International EMF Scientist Appeal" has generated to a greater extent than than 48 tidings stories inwards 26 nations written inwards 21 unlike languages attesting to the global hit of this petition.


May 16, 2015

On Monday, May 11th, 190 scientists from 39 nations submitted an appeal to the United Nations, the United Nations fellow member states, as well as the World Health Organization (WHO) requesting they adopt to a greater extent than protective exposure guidelines for electromagnetic fields (EMF) as well as wireless technology* inwards the seem upwardly of increasing bear witness of risk.These exposures are a chop-chop growing shape of environmental pollution worldwide. 

*(e.g., jail cellular telephone phones, cordless phones, Wi-Fi, wireless devices, jail cellular telephone towers, wireless utility meters).

The “International EMF Scientist Appeal” asks the Secretary General, United Nations affiliated bodies as well as all fellow member nations to encourage precautionary measures, to bound EMF exposures, as well as to educate earth nearly wellness risks, especially to children as well as meaning women.

To date, the petition has been signed by 200 EMF scientists from 40 countries -- each has published peer-reviewed enquiry on non-ionizing EMF as well as biological scientific discipline or wellness -- nearly 2,000 scientific papers inwards all. 

The EMFscientist.org web site launched terminal Mon has been visited past times people inwards 119 countries attesting to the global hit of this emerging world wellness crisis. The site contains data nearly this "wake upwardly call" from the scientific community including a 3-minute video announcing the Appeal by Dr. Martin Blank, a past times president of the International Bioelectromagnetics Society who has had over 30 years of sense conducting EMF enquiry at Columbia University.

The International EMF Alliance has begun to collect endorsements of the Appeal from non-governnmental (i.e., non-profit) organizations unopen to the world.]


May 11, 2015


PRESS RELEASE


International Scientists Appeal to U.N. to Protect Humans as well as Wildlife from Electromagnetic Fields as well as Wireless Technology


WHO’s conflicting stance on opportunity needs strengthening, says 190 scientists


New York, NY, May 11, 2015. Today 190 scientists from 39 nations submitted an appeal to the United Nations, United Nations fellow member states as well as the World Health Organization (WHO) requesting they adopt to a greater extent than protective exposure guidelines for electromagnetic fields (EMF) as well as wireless engineering scientific discipline inwards the seem upwardly of increasing bear witness of risk. These exposures are a chop-chop growing shape of environmental pollution worldwide.

The “International EMF Scientist Appeal” asks the Secretary General as well as United Nations affiliated bodies to encourage precautionary measures, to bound EMF exposures, as well as to educate the world nearly wellness risks, especially to children as well as meaning women.

The Appeal highlights WHO’s conflicting positions nearly EMF risk. WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer classified Radiofrequency radiations every bit a Group 2B “Possible Carcinogen” inwards 2011, as well as Extremely Low Frequency fields inwards 2001.  Nonetheless, WHO continues to ignore its ain agency’s recommendations as well as favors guidelines recommended past times the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). These guidelines, developed past times a self-selected grouping of manufacture insiders, cause got long been criticized every bit non-protective.

The Appeal calls on the United Nations to strengthen its advisories on EMF opportunity for humans as well as to assess the potential touching on wild animals as well as other living organisms nether the auspices of the United Nations Environmental Programme, inwards draw of piece of job alongside the scientific discipline demonstrating risk, thereby resolving this inconsistency.

Martin Blank, PhD, of Columbia University, says, 
"International exposure guidelines for electromagnetic fields must hold upwardly strengthened to reverberate the reality of their touching on our bodies, especially on our DNA. The fourth dimension to bargain alongside the harmful biological as well as wellness effects is long overdue. We must cut back exposure past times establishing to a greater extent than protective guidelines.”
Joel Moskowitz, PhD, of University of California, Berkeley, says, 

“ICNIRP guidelines laid exposure standards for high-intensity, short-term, tissue-heating thresholds. These create non protect us from the low-intensity, chronic exposures mutual today. Scientists signing the Appeal asking that the United Nations as well as fellow member nations protect the global human population as well as wild animals from EMF exposures.”
International EMF Scientist Appeal, Description of the Appeal as well as Spokesperson Quotes:  EMFscientist.org

Video Statement (3 min.) past times Spokesperson Martin Blank, PhD:  EMFscientist.org
     (An hard disk version of the video contention is available on request.)

Contacts:

Elizabeth Kelley, MA, Director             Joel Moskowitz, PhD               
EMFscientist.org                                  School of Public Health, UC Berkeley
info@EMFscientist.org                         jmm@berkeley.edu
                                                                             

Berlangganan update artikel terbaru via email:

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel