Empathy, Taxes, Personal Responsibility, Together With Healthcare Reform – A Timely Ground (Part 2)
In a prior post, I examined the how empathy (i.e., the might to pose oneself inwards the shoes of another), which is ofttimes lacking from the healthcare reform debate, ought to locomote an essential constituent inwards the decisions our province makes. My intelligence almost the ask for greater empathy triggered a contentious combat betwixt a human being working inwards the insurance manufacture as well as myself. The offset business office of this hot combat is at this link. Following is the instant part. Please experience complimentary to bring together in.
He wrote:
I ain 3 TPAs…Both sides of my delineate of piece of occupation organisation entail helping employers offering insurance to a greater extent than efficiently. This is ordinarily at the expense of insurance companies. We assail the fat. We convey also been carving out a lot of drug plans because employers tin self fund the run a jeopardy cheaper as well as then paying premium to a carrier.
And, inwards answer to a intelligence we've been having almost Wendell Potter— insurance exec turned whistleblower, who spoke out against the underhanded tactics of the wellness insurance industry—he continued to discredit Mr. Potter past times saying:
I exercise know the left is quick to signal out he was an ex "insurance industry" executive only fails to cite he is right away on the payroll of a pro-reform, anti insurance society advocacy group. On THCB [The Health Care Blog] previously I posted a really long as well as detailed explanation of what damage he doesn't look to empathize as well as where he was lying. When fourth dimension permits I'll travail to discover it. I recollect at that topographic point are all sorts of abuses that could plow someone off of insurance companies as well as fifty-fifty atomic number 82 someone to receive against them…Mr. Potter is past times no way a whistle blower, he hasn't disclosed whatever abuse or actions that are non mutual knowledge. He's a paid shill at best.
I responded:
I would similar to encounter your post. And I'm glad you lot are non defending the abuses of insurance companies, fifty-fifty though the ones Mr. Potter pointed may locomote mutual noesis to for sure people. What would locomote bully is if you lot would part your noesis of all the abuses as well as underhanded actions you've observed.
In answer to my question—"Are you lot are insinuating that the correct form of capitalism is the pathologically mutated cast of complimentary marketplace capitalism we've been living amongst for many years, amongst its weak gov regulations" – He responded:
You don't know what the term complimentary marketplace means. Nothing almost our electrical current organisation is complimentary marketplace or weakly regulated.
To which I replied:
As I empathize it, many legislators convey a complimentary marketplace ideology that focuses on weakening or eliminating for sure governmental regulations that were originally created to protect the public. For example, Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke said nosotros ask to strengthen rule of fiscal markets to stalk excessive run a jeopardy taking (see this link). Anyway, telephone outcry upwards our electrical current organisation whatever you lot want. The signal is that those amongst complimentary marketplace cravings convey been conspiring to kill regulations that were preventing our fiscal meltdown and, no doubt, of import regulations inwards other areas convey been on the chopping block.
In answer to my statement—These sub-systems part diverse delineate of piece of occupation organisation models, operational processes, as well as metrics." – He replied:
I wouldn't telephone outcry upwards Medicare as well as private employer plans sub systems they are to distinct. And this whole signal matters because the failures of Medicare as well as Medicaid are a terrible argue to destroy our successful private insurance system. None of the reform existence discussed volition amend the private systems, it volition reallocate resources to the failed world plans thus they tin concluding a few years longer. Far from existence semantics it is the underlying argue why all regime reform fails to deliver what they hope earth it will.
To which I replied:
Still semantics. Sure, sub-systems tin locomote distinct. For example, similar the healthcare system, Nature is a complex organisation composed of interconnected parts (sub-systems) that every bit a whole demo i or to a greater extent than properties non obvious from the properties of the private parts; that is, it is a organisation of distinct interacting sub-systems. Same goes for the human body; the digestive as well as respiratory systems are distinct interacting sub-system of the human biological system.
As far every bit Medicare as well as Medicaid existence failed systems as well as private insurance existence successful system, I gauge nosotros convey to define what is meant past times "success." There are those who say these programs are successful because, amongst Medicare for example:
- Its universal coverage nature creates the might to redistribute benefits to those who are neediest.
- It pools run a jeopardy inwards lodge to part the burdens of wellness aid amid the salubrious as well as the sick.
- Through Medicare, the regime protects the rights of all beneficiaries to essential wellness aid (Reference)
And inwards an interesting interview, John Stewart summed upwards his conversation almost healthcare reform amongst conservative pundit Bill Kristol (editor of Weekly Standard): "So what you lot are suggesting is that the regime could run the best wellness aid organisation for Americans, only it's a piddling every bit good costly, thus nosotros should convey the shitty insurance society wellness care" (at this link.
Related links:
- Low-Cost, High-Quality Care In America: Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 Reply
- How to Reform Healthcare Sensibly: Focus on Two Clear Goals
- Healthcare Reform’s Most Important Issue: How to Make it a High-Value System
- Empathy, Taxes, Personal Responsibility, as well as Healthcare Reform
- Empathy, Taxes, Personal Responsibility, as well as Healthcare Reform – Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 Timely Debate (part 1)
- Healthcare Reform: Where to Focus?